Skip to main content

Key points

  • Make every effort to settle your dispute before you start your claim.
  • You can reach a settlement at any time after starting your claim and the court will expect you to settle if you can.
  • If you make an offer to settle, mark it ‘without prejudice save as to costs’.
  • When deciding whether to make or accept an offer, consider the strength of your case, the value of your claim, and the offer amount you might be prepared to accept. Bear in mind the expense, time and stress involved of going to trial.
  • Choosing not to accept a reasonable Part 36 offer to settle could cost you later.
     

What does ‘settling’ a claim mean?

It is normal to try to sort out a dispute by reaching a financial agreement with the other side before the trial. This is called ‘settling’. It should not be seen as 'climbing down'. The court will expect you to settle if you can and if you don’t accept a reasonable offer, it could cost you more later.
 

In this guide you will learn:

  • How to make an offer to settle
  • What to do if the other side makes an offer to settle
  • What a Part 36 offer is and the risks associated with not accepting one
  • How to accept a Part 36 offer
  • What to do if you are not able to settle
     

This guide is for you if you:

  • are involved in a civil claim in either England or Wales, and
  • your case involves a claim for £25,000 or less, and
  • you are representing yourself (you are a litigant in person) and not eligible to have your case paid for by legal aid, a trade union, or insurance.

This guide is also for people supporting litigants in person, for example Support Through Court volunteers, Citizens Advice volunteers, housing support workers, advice workers and court staff, as well as relatives and friends.

This guide will not help if your case is:

  • a criminal case,
  • a family case (such as an application for a domestic violence injunction or a divorce),
  • a housing disrepair or housing possession case including mortgage possession,
  • about getting an injunction (including court claims about anti-social behaviour),
  • a medical accident case,
  • a case involving defamation (that is libel or slander), or
  • a tribunal case (such as a discrimination or employment case).

Legal language

We try to explain any legal language as we go along, but there is also a What does it mean? section at the end.

Top Tip

Taking someone to court should always be a last resort. 

See our guide to using Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) instead of going to court. And our guide to the process the court expects you to follow to resolve your dispute before taking legal action

See if you can get free legal advice about your civil case

Please help us

Tell us if this information was useful. You help us make it better, help other people know what was useful, and help us get funding to keep our website going.

Tell us what you think

You can reach an agreement/resolve the dispute with the defendant either before or after you begin court proceedings. 

The court expects you to have tried to reach an agreement before you start your case. In fact, you must follow a particular procedure to do so. We explain these rules and what you have to do to follow them in our guide Pre-action protocols – What you need to know before starting a claim.

Once the case has started, you can try to settle the claim at any time. This can be done through: 

  • informal discussions - either face-to-face, or by phone or video call, or
    making a proposal in writing, or
  • by attending mediation, or another form of alternative dispute resolution, or
    a combination of all of these things.

All written communications and discussions about settlement should be marked “without prejudice” or “without prejudice save as to costs”. 

This means that they are confidential. If you do end up going to trial, the general rule is that "without prejudice" communications will not be shown to the court and cannot form part of the other side’s case and be used against you. 

If you are making an offer to settle, it should always be marked “without prejudice save as to costs”. This means that it will not be shown to the court during the trial, but may be shown to the judge at the end of the case when the court is being asked to consider who pays the costs. It can be useful at that stage to show the judge any “without prejudice save as to costs” communications to show that you have been acting reasonably. 

Things to consider when trying to settle your dispute

  • What is the likelihood of your claim succeeding at trial? How likely is it that you will lose?
  • What is the value of the claim? What are you likely to be awarded if you go to trial?
  • What would you be prepared to accept? This should be less than the value of the claim, if it means you save the expense and hassle of going to court.
  • What might the defendant be prepared to pay? This might be more than they think the claim is worth if it means they save the expense and hassle of going to court.
  • What would be the costs of going to court and losing? Would you have to pay the other side’s expenses? Would you have to pay some or all of their legal costs? See Legal costs and who pays them for more information about this.
  • Could there be any other consequences of losing?
     

If you can, get advice

If you can find free legal advice or if you can afford to pay for just one appointment- an expert may help you answer the questions above and decide what you would be prepared to settle for. Advice will also help you to understand what your best arguments are, to help you put pressure on the other side to settle. 
 

The court rules also offer a formal way of trying to settle your claim. These rules encourage the other side to accept a reasonable offer by providing financial incentives to do so. They are known as a ‘Part 36 offer to settle’, named after the court rule describing the procedure - Part 36 of the Civil Procedure Rules (or CPR).

Who can make a Part 36 offer and when?

A Part 36 offer to settle can be made:

  • By the claimant or the defendant. If you are the claimant, you can make a Part 36 offer, but you may also need to deal with a Part 36 offer made by the defendant. For either, you will have to carefully and realistically value your case.
  • In fast track, intermediate and multi-track claims only. You cannot use the Part 36 process in small claims. (In small claims, both sides can make offers to settle, and have “without prejudice” or “without prejudice save as to costs” communications, but the formal rules in Part 36 do not apply.)
  • Before or after the start of court proceedings, right up to near trial (special rules apply close to trial).

 

The receiver of the Part 36 offer is called the ‘offeree’.

Part 36 offers can be an incentive to settle because they can affect the amount of legal costs that one side has to pay the other side. They also offer a tactical advantage in forcing the other side to pause and think very hard about the strengths, weaknesses and value of their case. 

Whether you decide to make or accept a Part 36 offer depends on:

  • which side makes the offer,
  • whether or not the offer is accepted,
  • if it is accepted, whether this is within or after expiry of the relevant period (see below),
  • if it is not accepted, what happens at the trial. 

If you turn down a Part 36 offer, but don’t get a better result from the judge at the trial than the original offer, you will have to pay all the other side’s legal costs from the end of what is known as the ‘relevant period’

This ‘relevant period’ is the time you are given to consider (and accept) the offer by the offeror. It is usually 21 days from when the offer was made, and the exact number of days given has to be set out in the offer.

Example

Mark claims £12,600. It is a fast-track case. The defendant, Joan, makes a Part 36 offer to pay Mark £11,000 on 1 February giving Mark a relevant period of 21 days to accept. Mark decides the sum is not enough, and chooses to let the case go to trial. 

At the trial on 10 July Mark wins. The court awards him £10,900. This award doesn’t beat the Part 36 offer to settle made by Joan. Mark will therefore be very likely to have to pay all Joan’s legal costs from 22 February to 10 July including the costs of the trial, plus interest. Mark needed to be awarded £11,000.01 or more to avoid being ordered to pay any of Joan’s legal costs from the end of the relevant period. 

If Joan is representing herself, she can ask the court to order Mark to pay her costs of preparation (if she had kept a proper record of this preparation, usually up to £24 per hour). If Joan is legally represented, Mark will have to pay her solicitor and barrister’s costs, which could run to many thousands of pounds.

Because Mark was the claimant and won the case, Joan still has to pay his legal costs up to 22nd February (the end of the relevant period).

It’s more common to receive a Part 36 offer if the defendant has a solicitor.

You must take any Part 36 offer that you receive very seriously. Think carefully about what your claim is worth and how good your case is, and if you are prepared to accept the offer, given that it would remove the risk (and hassle and expense) of going to trial.

It is often very difficult to assess whether an offer is good or reasonable (and a defendant isn’t obliged to explain how they came to the amount). If you can, get some legal advice to help you decide.

You will usually only get the relevant period of 21 days to accept. Most reasonable defendants will extend that time for a few days if you have a good reason, but you will need to ask – don’t just ignore the deadline! Needing a short period of extra time to consider the offer with a solicitor’s advice would be a reasonable reason to ask for an extension to the relevant period.

A Part 36 offer can be accepted after the relevant period, unless it has been withdrawn. However, if you accept it after the relevant period, you will have to pay the other side’s legal costs from the end of the relevant period to the date you accepted the offer.

One big factor in many cases is that if the defendant says you are partly at fault, and the judge agrees, you are at risk of losing a proportion of the value of your claim. For example, if you are found to be one third to blame, you will lose one third of the value of your claim. This is often known as 'contributory fault' or 'contributory negligence'.

Example 1

You slipped on a wet floor at work and fell, injuring your leg. You were off work and lost earnings, and had other losses and expenses. You used the Judicial College Guidelines for the Assessment of General Damages in Personal injury Cases (starting p52) and valued your leg injury at £6,000 and your loss of earnings and other losses and expenses at £5,000, totalling £11,000. The defendant said despite the floor being wet (which was their fault), you were 50% at fault for running and not looking where you were going, that your leg injury was less serious, and that you were off work for longer than you medically needed to be. They offered £4,800 to settle. You didn't agree, and started court proceedings. They have now made a Part 36 offer of £7,000.

If the judge decides the defendant was completely at fault, and you were reasonably off work, you could get the full £11,000. However, if the defendant is successful in what they say about you at trial, you might end up, with:

  • as little as £5,000 if the judge decides you were 50% to blame, and that you should have been back at work sooner, or
  • £7,260 if the judge accepts the amounts you have claimed, but decides you were one third to blame, or
  • just under £7,000 if the judge decides you were one third to blame, but slightly reduces your losses and expenses claim (for example, deciding you could have been back at work a few weeks earlier). This award fails to beat the Part 36 offer.

Any award that does not beat the Part 36 offer of £7,000 will very likely result in you paying the other side's legal costs and interest on those costs, from the end of the relevant period to the trial.

Some claims are simpler to assess, as they don't involve any possible contributory fault and are simply a matter of value.

 

Example 2

Your caravan was smashed when parked in your driveway by your neighbour's builder's digger. You have claimed £15,000. The builder's insurers have made a Part 36 offer of £14,000.

Are you prepared to accept less than the value of your claim to put an end to all the risks involved in going to trial? How confident are you that you will get the full £15,000?

Any award that does not beat the £14,000 Part 36 offer will result in you paying the other side's legal costs and interest from the end of the relevant period to the trial.

You need to tell the offeror that you accept the offer in writing, and also send confirmation to the court. 

It is possible to accept the offer by writing a letter. However, as there are specific rules on accepting an offer and the information to include, the easiest thing is to use the ‘notice of acceptance’ form at the end of the N242A form. 

How long do I have to accept or refuse a Part 36 offer to settle?

As long as it has not been withdrawn, you can accept an offer at any time. However, if you accept it within the relevant period (which is at least 21 days but may be more depending on what it says in the Notice of Offer to Settle), you will have to pay the other side’s legal costs. If you accept it after the relevant period, you have to pay the other side’s legal costs from the end of the relevant period to the date you accepted it.  

 

Either side can make a Part 36 offer to encourage the other side to agree to a settlement. The impact on who has to pay legal costs depends on whether or not the other side accepts and, if so, when. 

Where the claimant has made the offer and the defendant accepts, the defendant will very likely have to pay the claimant’s costs from the beginning of the claim to the date they accepted the offer. 

If the defendant does not accept the offer, the case goes to trial, and the claimant is awarded an amount equal to or higher than the offer, the court will order the defendant to pay the claimant's costs from the beginning of the case to the trial. The court will also order (unless it is unjust to do so):

  • interest on the damages awarded,
  • interest on the costs (or an uplift of 35% to costs where the Fixed costs regime applies),
  • an additional sum, calculated as a percentage of the amount awarded by the court, up to a maximum of £75,000.

Be aware!

If you are a successful claimant and representing yourself, you will only get your costs for preparing the case at a maximum amount of £24 per hour (or whatever earnings you lost, if that is higher), assuming you kept proper records of the amount of time it took you. 

However, a represented defendant may be incurring costs at £100 - £400 per hour, depending on the charging rate and location (central London or elsewhere) of their solicitor (and barrister, if they have one).

 

I am the claimant
  • The offer must be in writing. It is best to use the form (N242A) linked in the box below to do this. This way you can be sure not to leave anything out. You can make the offer by letter if you prefer, but you run the risk of not including all the relevant information required by court rules.
  • Make sure the offer is marked ‘without prejudice save as to costs’. (see section below)
  • If you make the offer by letter, you must:
  1. Make it clear that you intend your letter to have the effect of a Part 36 offer.
  2. Explain that if the defendant accepts your offer within the relevant period (the time allowed for them to consider it), then you will be entitled to your legal costs up to the date when the defendant accepted the offer (see below for the rules about accepting). So, if the defendant decides that the best thing to do is to accept the offer, the quicker they do this, the quicker they can stop the bill for your legal costs going up and up.
  3. Explain clearly what part of your case the offer relates to. Is it some of it or all of it? Usually it will be all of it. Does the offer also include interest?
  4. Explain clearly whether the offer takes into account any counterclaim made by the defendant.
     
I am the defendant

As well as giving the same information as the claimant (see above), you must also:

  • Explain that you will pay the money you have offered the claimant within 14 days of them accepting the offer.

 

You can make a Part 36 offer to settle using the notice in Form N242A

You can accept an offer using the notice of acceptance at the back of Form N242A

Relevant Rule: Part 36 - Offers to settle

Additional rules: Practice direction 36 Offers to settle

Even if you have been unable to settle the dispute, the court expects you to show you have co-operated with the other side in trying to establish what it is you don’t agree on, and in providing each other with information. 

If the attempt to settle (either an informal offer or a formal Part 36 offer) has been unsuccessful, the judge doesn’t get to know what has been offered and rejected until after the trial. This means that their judgment will not be affected by the value of the offer. It only becomes relevant after trial when the judge decides what to do about legal costs. 

Make sure you have followed the relevant pre-action protocols and court rules.

Civil procedure rules 

The court rules that you have to follow when you take someone to court.

Costs on an indemnity basis, or indemnity costs

Although this is not the norm, the judge can order that costs are assessed on an indemnity basis. This means that if there is a dispute about whether the costs were unreasonably high or unnecessary, the court is likely to decide in favour of the person who made the offer, and not the side that rejected the offer. This is likely to result in a higher overall costs bill than if costs are assessed on the standard basis.

Costs on a standard basis, or standard costs 

The usual rule is that the successful party is entitled to their costs on the standard basis. This means that if there is any doubt about whether the costs were unreasonably high or unnecessary, the court is likely to decide in favour of the side that  has to pay.

Pre-action conduct 

The name of the process the court expects you to follow before you start your claim if there isn’t a pre-action protocol that applies to your case. This refers to the way you behave and the steps you must take. See our guide to pre-action conduct and protocol.

Pre-action protocol

The name of the process the court expects you to follow before you start your claim. There are specific pre-action protocols for many types of case. See our guide to pre-action protocols.

Relevant period

This is the period (usually 21 days from when a Part 36 offer was made) during which the offeree can accept the Part 36 offer and take advantage of the more favourable costs consequences. The relevant period has to be set out in the offer and cannot be less than 21 days.

Without prejudice

If you do end up going to court, neither side will be allowed to tell the judge about any communications with “without prejudice” written on them. So, anything said in these communications can be said openly and safely in the knowledge that it cannot form part of the other side’s case.

Without prejudice save as to costs

Any communications labelled “without prejudice save as to costs” cannot be shown to the judge until after the trial, when they are deciding on the amount of costs the losing side has to pay.

Disclaimer

The information in this guide applies to England and Wales only. The law may be different if you live in Scotland or Northern Ireland. 

The law is complicated. We have simplified things in this guide. Please don’t rely on this guide as a complete statement of the law. We recommend you try and get advice from the sources we have suggested.

The cases we refer to are not always real but show a typical situation. We have included them to help you think about how to deal with your own situation.

Acknowledgements

This guide was produced and updated by Advicenow with additional material from Laura Bee. 

We would like to thank everybody who commented on the updated guide and editorial teams at Thomson Reuters who kindly peer reviewed this updated version.

This version was updated thanks to funding from the Ministry of Justice, via the Online Support and Advice Grant. 

 

Was this information useful?

Choose as many as you want.

Site search:

Quality Checked
  Close Search
Launch Recite Me assistive technology