Witnesses may not always have to stand up and give evidence in the witness box.
If a witness does answer questions in the witness box, they cannot take anything into the witness box but themselves. They will be given a copy of the trial bundle (which will contain a copy of their statement and all relevant documents). They are expected to be familiar with their evidence and will be asked to confirm that it is theirs, and that they have read it.
Each witness will be asked to swear a religious oath on their chosen holy book orto make an affirmation to tell the truth. It is a serious offence to lie in court after swearing an oath or making an affirmation.
The written witness statement should represent the entirety of the witness evidence.
If you and your witness are happy with their written witness statement, you just need to ask them to confirm that the content is true.
If there are any mistakes or problems with what one of your witnesses has said, this is your only opportunity to deal with this. Get the witness to explain, for example, what the mistake is, why it was made and what the correct position is. It is much better to get this out in the open as soon as possible, rather than leave it to the other side to expose it and make it look as though you were hiding something.
If you want the witness to expand on something in their statement, you will have to ask the judge for permission, and there will need to be a good reason. You will be allowed to ask the witness questions about something that has happened since the witness statements were exchanged. But if you have simply forgotten to include something relevant in the witness statement, then the judge is unlikely to allow you to make up for that at the trial.
Small claims and witnesses
In a small claim, the judge can decide on any way of managing the hearing that he or she considers fair. This might mean the judge decides to question the witnesses directly, before allowing anyone else to. The judge might also decide to limit cross-examination, or not allow it at all.
Cross examination
Cross examination is the legal term used to describe the process of asking the other side’s witnesses questions. The claimant, the defendant and any other witnesses must all expect to be cross-examined.
You need to think about:
- The questions you are going to ask other people.
- The questions you and your witnesses are likely to be asked by the other side. Put yourself in their shoes. What would you ask yourself if you were them?
The questions you are going to ask other people
Your aim is to bring out the facts that support your own case and weaken the other side’s. Your questions need to be about whose fault it is, the value of your claim, and the credibility (or believability) of their witnesses or evidence.
You will usually suggest that something happened differently or that it didn’t happen at all. You may be able to do this, for example, by comparing what the witness says with evidence that suggest something else happened, for example, in a document or photograph.
You need to do some advance preparation by reading through the other side’s witness statements carefully and picking out any problems with what they say. You are looking for points that undermine their case or support your own. Cross examination is your only chance to do this – so do not miss it.
Resist the temptation to comment on what the other side’s witnesses say in reply to your questions. Leave this for when you make your closing submission.
The questions the other side asks you and your witnesses
You also need to prepare yourself and your witnesses for cross examination by explaining the likely questions you think they will get asked. This does not mean you can tell them what to say – you cannot. They have to come up with their own answers. They need to be truthful and answer the questions they are asked and no more.
It is normal for the witness to be referred to specific sections of the trial bundle during cross-examination. If the person cross-examining does not do that, the witness can ask the judge's permission to look at the trial bundle to check a document. This is not a formal process, and so the witness can simply say ‘Please can I look at document X or Y in the bundle Sir / Ma'am?’
Re-examination
Re-examination is the legal word used to describe the process of asking your own witnesses some more questions after they have been cross examined by the other side. The purpose is to give them a chance to explain things that came up when they were questioned by the other side, to make sure that the judge is not left with the wrong impression about something. However, you are not allowed to use re-examination simply to ask things which did not come up in cross-examination, but which you forgot to ask first time round.
You are also not allowed to ask your witness leading questions – these are questions posed in such a way that suggest the answer you want them to give.
And unless you know that your witness’s answer to your question will improve the situation, it may be best to leave things as they are and ask no further questions.